Tom Hundley🤖 Ghostwritten by Claude · Curated by Tom Hundley
This article was written by Claude and curated for publication by Tom Hundley.
AI-first has become the corporate equivalent of synergy—a term so overused it risks meaning nothing at all. Yet behind the buzzword lies a genuine strategic transformation thats separating market leaders from laggards.
AI-first companies are rewriting the playbook for all organizations, generating tens of millions of dollars in annual revenue with just a few dozen employees. The AI-first operating model rewires how organizations work. Hierarchies flatten as AI agents—overseen by humans—operate back-office processes. Work organizes around lean, elite teams of specialized, well-paid employees.
This isnt incremental improvement. Its a different way of building and running a company. And for CEOs, understanding what AI-first actually means is the difference between leading the transformation and being disrupted by it.
Lets be precise about terminology. An AI-first company isnt simply one that uses AI tools. Its an organization where:
The distinction matters. Many companies are AI-enabled—theyve added chatbots, automated reports, deployed copilots. Fewer are AI-first—structured around the assumption that AI handles substantial portions of work traditionally done by humans.
Heres the counterintuitive truth that separates successful AI transformations from failed ones: 64% of CEOs believe that succeeding with AI will depend more on peoples adoption than the technology itself.
This creates what we might call the AI-first paradox: building an AI-first company is fundamentally a human challenge, not a technology challenge.
AI transformation is cultural and cross-functional—CEOs must own the vision, secure resources, and ensure full leadership alignment. The technology is table stakes. The transformation is organizational.
The CEO sets the vision and direction, which can come to life in an AI manifesto and be embedded in the strategy. This manifesto should address:
This isnt a technology document—its a strategic declaration that shapes every subsequent decision.
Your AI strategy needs more than a single leader. Effective AI leadership includes builders, operators, and strategists who collaborate across functions.
The model that works:
| Role | Responsibility | Reports To |
|---|---|---|
| Chief AI Officer | Strategy, governance, capability building | CEO |
| AI Champions (by function) | Domain-specific implementation | Function heads |
| AI Operations | Infrastructure, platforms, tooling | CTO/CIO |
| AI Ethics/Governance | Risk, compliance, responsible use | Legal/Chief Ethics Officer |
No single leader can span the technical depth, business understanding, and organizational influence required. AI-first companies distribute leadership while maintaining strategic coherence.
A critical insight from recent research: while senior leaders shape how AI can support strategy, midlevel leaders play a pivotal role in both driving execution and enabling transformational change.
Midlevel leaders serve as:
Companies that neglect midlevel enablement find that strategic AI initiatives stall at the execution layer.
If you lack an understanding of AI, you cannot effectively lead a company focused on AI. Actionable shift: ensure every executive completes comprehensive AI upskilling programs.
This isnt about turning executives into data scientists. Its about building sufficient fluency to:
The biggest barrier to scaling AI isnt the workforce, but leadership hesitation.
The newest challenge for AI-first strategy is the emergence of agentic AI. For business leaders, agentic AI upends the fundamental management calculation around technology deployment. Their job is no longer simply installing smarter tools but guiding organizations where entire portions of the workforce are synthetic, distributed, and continuously evolving.
This means rethinking:
Organizational Structure
Traditional reporting hierarchies assume humans at every node. AI-first organizations increasingly have AI agents reporting to human managers, handling tasks autonomously within defined parameters.
Performance Management
When AI handles substantial work, how do you measure human contribution? The answer is shifting toward outcome ownership rather than task completion.
Decision Rights
Which decisions can AI make autonomously? Which require human approval? Which need human decision-making with AI input? AI-first companies have explicit frameworks for these questions.
Focus: Vision, alignment, and literacy
CEO role: Champion the vision, participate visibly in upskilling
Focus: Proving value in targeted areas
CEO role: Remove barriers, celebrate wins, learn from failures
Focus: Expanding what works
CEO role: Ensure resource allocation, maintain strategic coherence
Focus: Operating as AI-first
CEO role: Guide strategic evolution, maintain ethical standards
AI remains a top priority for business leaders worldwide in 2025, with a strong focus on generating tangible results. The question isnt whether to become AI-first—its how quickly and effectively you can make the transition.
The companies that treat AI as a technology project will fall behind. The companies that treat it as an organizational transformation—led from the top, enabled through the middle, adopted at the front lines—will define their industries.
For CEOs, the imperative is clear: this is not a delegation-friendly initiative. AI-first transformation requires visible, sustained, personal leadership. The technology will keep advancing. The question is whether your organization will advance with it.
div class=ai-collaboration-card
This article is a live example of the AI-enabled content workflow we build for clients.
| Stage | Who | What |
|---|---|---|
| Research | Claude Opus 4.5 | Analyzed current industry data, studies, and expert sources |
| Curation | Tom Hundley | Directed focus, validated relevance, ensured strategic alignment |
| Drafting | Claude Opus 4.5 | Synthesized research into structured narrative |
| Fact-Check | Human + AI | All statistics linked to original sources below |
| Editorial | Tom Hundley | Final review for accuracy, tone, and value |
The result: Research-backed content in a fraction of the time, with full transparency and human accountability.
/div
Were an AI enablement company. It would be strange if we didnt use AI to create content. But more importantly, we believe the future of professional content isnt AI vs. Human—its AI amplifying human expertise.
Every article we publish demonstrates the same workflow we help clients implement: AI handles the heavy lifting of research and drafting, humans provide direction, judgment, and accountability.
Want to build this capability for your team? Lets talk about AI enablement →
Discover more content:
