Tom HundleyPart 1 of 3
🤖 Ghostwritten by Claude · Curated by Tom Hundley
This article was written by Claude and curated for publication by Tom Hundley.
Heres a number that should concern every CEO: 78% of organizations now use AI in at least one business function—up from 55% just a year ago. But heres the number that should alarm you: only 33% have embedded AI company-wide, and fewer than 39% report any measurable impact on their bottom line.
Most organizations are doing AI. Very few are benefiting from it.
The gap between AI adoption and AI value isnt a technology problem—its a strategy problem. And that makes it your problem.
Enterprise AI implementation takes 12-24 months from initial assessment to scaled deployment. Not 12-24 months to experiment. Not 12-24 months to pilot. Twelve to twenty-four months to move from we should do something with AI to AI is generating measurable business value.
Do the math:
This isnt about being first. Its about not being last.
72% of data strategy leaders now believe that failing to implement AI will cost them their competitive edge. This isnt IT paranoia—its board-level strategic concern.
McKinseys latest research reveals a critical differentiator: high-performing organizations are three times more likely to have senior leaders who demonstrate ownership and commitment to AI initiatives. The CEOs at these companies arent delegating AI to IT and checking in quarterly. Theyre actively engaged in driving adoption, including role-modeling the use of AI themselves.
The data is clear: AI success correlates directly with executive ownership.
Yet Gartner reports that CEOs perceive significant skill gaps in their C-level team members around AI—gaps even wider than those CEOs saw during digital transformation a decade ago. The executives youre counting on to lead this may not be ready.
Your board will ask about AI strategy. Investors will ask. Customers will ask. Partners will ask. Were working on it stops being an acceptable answer in 2026.
Before you can build an AI roadmap, you need honest answers to three questions. Bring these to your next leadership meeting:
57% of organizations say their data isnt AI-ready. This isnt a technical detail—its a strategic blocker. AI systems are only as good as the data theyre trained on. If your customer data lives in silos, if your operational data is inconsistent, if your historical records are incomplete, then AI initiatives will fail regardless of how much you invest in them.
The question isnt whether you have data. Its whether that data is clean, accessible, governed, and documented well enough for AI systems to use it. Most organizations assume their data is better than it is.
72% of CIOs report that their organizations are breaking even or losing money on AI investments. One reason: ungoverned AI experiments scattered across departments, each solving local problems without enterprise coordination.
Governance isnt bureaucracy—its the difference between a portfolio of strategic investments and a collection of expensive science projects. Who approves AI use cases? Who owns the data? Whats acceptable risk? How do you measure success?
Not a 5-year vision. Not a transformation manifesto. A concrete plan for the next four quarters: what youll assess, what youll pilot, what youll build, and how youll know its working.
If your team cant articulate a specific 12-month plan, you dont have a strategy. You have an aspiration.
By Q1 2026, your organization should have:
A documented strategy, not PowerPoint aspirations. A real strategy includes prioritized use cases, resource allocation, success metrics, and accountability. Its specific enough that someone could execute it without you in the room.
A completed data readiness assessment. Not a guess—an actual audit of your data infrastructure, quality, accessibility, and governance gaps. This assessment will likely reveal that youre further behind than you thought. Thats the point.
2-3 priority use cases with ROI models. Not twenty ideas from a brainstorm. Two or three use cases that your leadership team has vetted, that have clear business value, and that your infrastructure can actually support. (See our Enterprise AI Implementation Roadmap for a framework.)
An established governance and ethics framework. Before AI makes decisions that affect customers, employees, or partners, you need to know whos accountable and what guardrails are in place.
A defined talent and partner strategy. Will you build internal AI capabilities, partner with specialists, or both? This decision affects timeline, cost, and risk.
The companies that treat AI as a 2027 problem will find themselves competing in 2027 against organizations that solved their data readiness problems in 2025, built their integration infrastructure in 2026, and are scaling AI applications while others are still in assessment.
This isnt about hype. Its about timelines. The work required to become AI-ready takes longer than most executives expect, and every quarter of delay is a quarter your competitors are using to build advantages that compound over time.
Your CTO needs to understand the technical implications. Your CMO needs to own the data that will fuel customer-facing AI. But the strategic decision to prioritize AI readiness—to allocate resources, to demand accountability, to model the urgency—that decision belongs to you.
This is Part 1 of The AI Roadmap Imperative series. Part 2: A CTOs Guide to Technical Readiness covers the infrastructure and data architecture decisions that determine whether AI initiatives succeed or fail. Part 3: A CMOs Guide to Data-Driven Readiness addresses the first-party data strategy that marketing leaders must own.
For a detailed implementation framework, see our Enterprise AI Implementation Roadmap.
Discover more content:
