RAG vs Fine-tuning: Which Approach Should You Use?

The Open Book vs. the Studied Student - ending the debate once and for all.

The Confusion

A client comes to us and says: We want to fine-tune Llama-3 on our company policies so it knows how to answer HR questions.

We say: Stop. You dont want Fine-tuning. You want RAG.

The confusion stems from a misunderstanding of how LLMs learn.

The Exam Metaphor 🎓

Pre-training: Teaching a student how to read, write, and reason generally. (This is what OpenAI does).
Fine-tuning: Sending that student to medical school to memorize specific facts and jargon. (The student knows the info by heart).
RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation): Letting the student take the exam with an Open Textbook. They dont memorize the facts; they look them up.

Why RAG Wins for Enterprise Knowledge

For 95% of business use cases, RAG is superior to Fine-tuning for three reasons:

1. Freshness 🥬

Fine-tuning: If your policy changes tomorrow, you have to re-train the model. That takes days and dollars.
RAG: You just update the PDF in the database. The model answers correctly immediately.

2. Citations 📖

Fine-tuning: The model hallucinates facts smoothly. It cant tell you where it learned that PTO is 15 days.
RAG: The model can say: According to the Employee Handbook (Page 12), PTO is 15 days. This is non-negotiable for enterprise trust.

3. Access Control 🔒

Fine-tuning: Once the model learns a secret, it knows it forever. You cant easily tell it Answer this for the CEO, but not for the Intern.
RAG: We filter the search results before the model sees them. If the user doesnt have permission to see the doc, the model never knows it exists.

When Should You Fine-Tune?

Fine-tuning isnt dead. It just has a different purpose. Fine-tune when:

You need a specific FORMAT: You want the model to output JSON that perfectly matches a weird legacy schema.
You need a specific TONE: You want the bot to sound exactly like your snarky brand voice.
You need to reduce LATENCY/COST: A small fine-tuned model (Llama-8B) can sometimes outperform a giant generic model (GPT-4) on a very narrow task.

The Verdict

Do you need the model to learn Knowledge? Use RAG.
Do you need the model to learn Behavior? Use Fine-tuning.

Most companies need Knowledge first. Start with RAG.

Next in the series: [Chunking Strategies That Actually Work](/blog/chunking-strategies-for-rag)

How This Article Was Made

This article is a live example of the AI-enabled content workflow we build for clients.

Stage	Who	What
Research	Claude Opus 4.5	Analyzed current industry data, studies, and expert sources
Curation	Tom Hundley	Directed focus, validated relevance, ensured strategic alignment
Drafting	Claude Opus 4.5	Synthesized research into structured narrative
Fact-Check	Human + AI	All statistics linked to original sources below
Editorial	Tom Hundley	Final review for accuracy, tone, and value

The result: Research-backed content in a fraction of the time, with full transparency and human accountability.

Why We Work This Way

Were an AI enablement company. It would be strange if we didnt use AI to create content. But more importantly, we believe the future of professional content isnt AI vs. Human—its AI amplifying human expertise.

Every article we publish demonstrates the same workflow we help clients implement: AI handles the heavy lifting of research and drafting, humans provide direction, judgment, and accountability.

Want to build this capability for your team? Lets talk about AI enablement →